World News For All

  • This is default featured slide 1 title

    Go to Blogger edit html and find these sentences.Now replace these sentences with your own descriptions.This theme is Bloggerized by Lasantha Bandara - Premiumbloggertemplates.com.

  • This is default featured slide 2 title

    Go to Blogger edit html and find these sentences.Now replace these sentences with your own descriptions.This theme is Bloggerized by Lasantha Bandara - Premiumbloggertemplates.com.

  • This is default featured slide 3 title

    Go to Blogger edit html and find these sentences.Now replace these sentences with your own descriptions.This theme is Bloggerized by Lasantha Bandara - Premiumbloggertemplates.com.

  • This is default featured slide 4 title

    Go to Blogger edit html and find these sentences.Now replace these sentences with your own descriptions.This theme is Bloggerized by Lasantha Bandara - Premiumbloggertemplates.com.

  • This is default featured slide 5 title

    Go to Blogger edit html and find these sentences.Now replace these sentences with your own descriptions.This theme is Bloggerized by Lasantha Bandara - Premiumbloggertemplates.com.

Sunday, May 22, 2016

Austria presidential vote: Run-off rivals face dead heat

Norbert Hofer (left) is up against Alexander Van der Bellen, who has the support of the Greens
The far-right and independent candidates in Austria's presidential run-off face a dead heat, a public TV projection suggests.
Norbert Hofer of the Freedom Party and Alexander Van der Bellen are each on 50%, according to the estimate, which includes postal votes not yet counted.
Official figures from Sunday's ballot give Mr Hofer a lead of 3.8% but do not include postal voting.
The final official results will not be known until Monday.
For the first time since World War Two, both the main centrist parties were knocked out in the first round.
A key issue in the campaign was Europe's migrant crisis, which has seen asylum-seeker numbers soar.
About 90,000 people claimed asylum in Austria last year, equivalent to about 1% of the Austrian population, and the Freedom Party ran an anti-immigration campaign.
The presidency is a largely ceremonial post, but a victory for Mr Hofer could be the springboard for Freedom Party success in the next parliamentary elections, scheduled for 2018.
The presidents of the European Commission and the European Parliament, Jean-Claude Juncker and Martin Schulz, have both expressed concern over a Hofer victory.

A country divided: Bethany Bell, BBC News, Vienna

Austria is split. The soft-spoken, charismatic Mr Hofer, sometimes described as a wolf in sheep's clothing, caused turmoil in Austrian politics when he won a clear victory in the first round of voting in April.
But now his rival, Mr Van der Bellen from the Greens, has caught up. The far right has profited from deep frustration with the established parties of the centre left and the centre right in Austria. And in recent months, it has been boosted further by fears about the migrant crisis.
The president is a largely ceremonial figure but does have the power to dismiss the government. Mr Hofer has threatened to do so if the ruling coalition does not take swift action on the migrant crisis.
If he wins, it could have an impact far beyond Austria's borders - possibly giving momentum to far-right and Eurosceptic parties in other EU countries.

According to the interior ministry's final count of votes cast at polling-stations(in German), Mr Hofer took 51.9% to 48.1% for Mr Van der Bellen.
But ORF public TV's projection (in German), which is usually considered reliable, has both men on 50%.
Postal voting accounts for some 900,000 ballots, or 14% of eligible voters.
"None of us wished for this," Mr Hofer told ORF.
"After all, both of us wanted to have a good night's sleep but it is so exciting. I've been in politics for a long time but I've never experienced an election night like this one."
Whoever won, he said, would have "the job of uniting Austria".
In the first round, Mr Hofer secured 35% of the votes, while Mr Van der Bellen polled 21%.
The two rivals had engaged in an angry TV debate earlier in the week, described as "political mud-wrestling" by commentators.

Vying to lead Austria

Norbert Hofer
Norbert Hofer in Pinkafeld, Austria, 22 MayImage copyrightEPA
  • Age: 45
  • Background: Aeronautical engineer
  • Politics: Far-right Freedom Party
  • Campaign soundbite: "To those in Austria who go to war for the Islamic State or rape women - I say to those people: 'This is not your home'"
Alexander Van der Bellen
Alexander Van der Bellen in Vienna, 22 MayImage copyrightAFP
  • Age: 72
  • Background: Economics professor
  • Politics: Former Green Party leader
  • Campaign soundbite: "I've experienced how Austria rose from the ruins of World War Two, caused by the madness of nationalism."

Political upset

Such was the political shock at the far right's first-round win that the Chancellor (prime minister), Werner Faymann, resigned after losing the support of his Social Democratic party colleagues.
The Social Democrats and the People's Party have governed Austria for decades, either alone or in coalition.
At the last general election in 2013, they together won just enough votes to govern in a "grand coalition".
Incumbent President Heinz Fischer, 77, could not run again after two terms in office.
Rise of nationalists in Europe - graphic
Share:

Friday, May 20, 2016

Health Expert Blasts CDC: Ignores Own Study, Allows Refugees Into U.S. Without Latent TB Screening

Dr. Jane Orient, executive director of the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons, is criticizing the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) for allowing refugees to enter the United States without screening and treatment for latent tuberculosis.

Seven of the agency’s own public health experts said such screening and treatment “would potentially save millions of dollars and contribute to United States TB elimination goals” in a research article published in December.
“Admitting people who might cause an epidemic makes no sense whatsoever from a public health standpoint,” Orient tells Breitbart News.
“It suggests that those who favor it do not care about the cost in suffering, death, and expense to Americans,” Orient says, adding she agrees with the public health experts currently or formerly employed at the CDC who concluded that screening of refugees for latent tuberculosis and successful treatment of those who test positive for the disease prior to their entry into the country is the proper public health policy for the United States.
But the political leadership at CDC does not appear to be following the screening and treatment recommendations of the study done by its own experts, and has not yet responded to inquiries from Breitbart News whether it plans to change course.
“If for humanitarian reasons we wish to help people fleeing persecution, there is still no need to release them into the general population of susceptible individuals. Officials who place politics above the health of Americans need to be held accountable and removed from positions of authority,” Orient says.
In a December 2015 study published at BMC Health, “a peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on the epidemiology of disease and the understanding of all aspects of public health,” seven public health professionals who at the time worked at the CDC’sDivision of Global Migration and Quarantine concluded that:
Implementing LTBI [latent tuberculosis infection] screening and treatment for United States bound refugees from countries with high or moderate LTBI prevalence would potentially save millions of dollars and contribute to United States TB elimination goals. These estimates are conservative since secondary transmission from tuberculosis cases in the United States was not considered in the model.
At least one of the authors of the study that recommended screening and treatment of U.S. bound refugees for latent tuberculosis infection is no longer affiliated with the CDC.
“Tuberculosis is one of the most lethal infectious diseases in history. It is easily transmitted, say on a public bus. Increasingly, it is becoming highly resistant to all our antibiotics,” Dr. Orient tells Breitbart News.
“The course of treatment is at best lengthy, and for resistant forms costly and toxic. Isolation of infected persons is essential to keep this plague from spreading. It is not even clear that treatment of latent infection in persons from regions where multiple-drug resistant TB is prevalent is even effective,” Orient adds.
Currently, however, the CDC does not screen or test the 70,000 refugees brought in to the U.S. annually under the federal refugee resettlement program country for latent tuberculosis infection. The refugees are tested for active tuberculosis, and allowed entry into the U.S. subsequent to what the CDC determines is successful treatment.
Even those refugees treated for active Multi Drug Resistant (MDR) tuberculosis, as shown in this video of Burmese refugees who have the disease being treated in a refugee camp in Thailand, are allowed to enter the United States despite recent studies that indicate that between 4 percent and 5 percent of those deemed successfully treated experience a recurrence of tuberculosis within 2 years.
The Minnesota Department of Health recently reported that 22 percent of resettled refugees in that state tested positive for latent tuberculosis, as opposed to 4 percent of the general population.
Other research indicates that anywhere from 20 percent to 49 percent of resettled refugees test positive for latent tuberculosis.
The CDC says that many resettled refugees are screened for latent tuberculosis within a month of their arrival in the United States, and encouraged to voluntarily participate in the 6 month to 9 month latent tuberculosis treatment regimens. Between 70 percent and 85 percent of those who participate successfully complete those latent tuberculosis treatment regimens, which means between 15 percent and 30 percent fail to complete those regimens.
More than 3 million refugees have been resettled in the United States since 1975, according to the Office of Refugee Resettlement (ORR), the department of Health and Human Services that operates the federal refugee resettlement program
Neither the CDC nor the ORR responded to inquiries from Breitbart News to get an estimate of the number of resettled refugees who are never screened for latent tuberculosis subsequent to their arrival in the United States.
Since 10 percent of those with latent tuberculosis develop active tuberculosis, the potential public health risk of the current policy is apparent to many public health experts, but not to the bureaucrats at the CDC and in a number of state and local health departments around the country.
Another arm of the federal government, the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF), however, recently issued a draft recommendation that is consistent with the findings of the December 2015 study about the importance of screening and treatment for latent tuberculosis population among “at risk” populations, which includes resettled refugees.
“The USPSTF recommends screening for latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) in populations that are at increased risk,” the draft recommendation concludes.
“Populations that are at increased risk for LTBI based on increased prevalence of active disease and increased risk of exposure include persons who were born in, or are former residents of, countries with increased tuberculosis prevalence and persons who live in, or have lived in, high-risk congregate settings (such as homeless shelters and correctional facilities),” the draft recommendation continues.
Crowded refugee camps in countries like Kenya, where many Somali refugees live prior to their entrance to the United States, are also “high-risk congregate settings.”
The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force, was founded as part of the federal government in 1984 as “an independent, volunteer panel of national experts in prevention and evidence-based medicine. The Task Force works to improve the health of all Americans by making evidence-based recommendations about clinical preventive services such as screenings, counseling services, and preventive medications.”
The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality “convene[s] the Task Force and . . . provide[s] ongoing scientific, administrative, and dissemination support to the Task Force.”
“The USPSTF recommends screening for latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) in populations that are at increased risk,” the draft recommendation concludes.
“In 2014, among persons of known national origin, 66.5% of all active tuberculosis cases in the United States were among foreign-born persons, and the case rate among foreign-born persons was 13.4 times higher than among U.S.-born persons (15.3 vs. 1.1 cases per 100,000 persons),” the draft recommendation continues.
“The World Health Organization (WHO) recently updated its list of countries with a high burden of tuberculosis to include the top 20 countries with the highest absolute numbers of cases, plus an additional 10 countries with the most severe burden in terms of case rate per capita,” the draft recommendation adds.
A number of countries on that list are also on the CDC’s list of  “[t]he top ten countries of refugee origin [which includes] Afghanistan, Iraq, Somali, DR Congo, Myanmar, Colombia, Sudan, Vietnam, Eritrea, and China.”
All ten of these countries had dramatically higher tuberculosis morbidity rates in 2014 than the United States, according to the World Health Organization.
That year, there were only 0.1 deaths from tuberculosis for every 100,000 residents of the United States.
The Democratic Republic of Congo, in contrast, experienced 69 deaths from tuberculosisfor every 100,000 residents, a rate more than 690 times greater than the rate in the United States.
Myanmar (Burma) experienced 53 deaths from tuberculosis for every 100,000 residents, a rate more than 530 times greater than the rate in the United States.
Afghanistan experienced 44 deaths from tuberculosis for every 100,000 residents, a rate more than 440 times greater than the rate in the United States.
China experienced the lowest tuberculosis mortality among the top ten countries of refugee origin in 2014—2.8 deaths per 100,000—but even that rate was 28 times greater than the rate in the United States.
Somalia, another of the ten leading countries of origins for resettled refugees in the U.S. had the second highest rate of tuberculosis mortality of the ten leading countries of origins for resettled refugees in the U.S.—67 tuberculosis deaths per 100,000—or more than 670 times greater than the rate in the United States.
Somalia is one of the top countries of origins for resettled refugees who settle in the states of Minnesota, North Dakota, and Tennessee.
In 2015, 26 percent of the 518 refugees resettled in North Dakota came from Somalia.
Some 45 percent of the 2,338 refugees who resettled in Minnesota during 2015 were from Somalia. 40 percent were from Burma.
The first evidence of a possible linkage between resettled refugees from Somalia to tuberculosis outbreaks in the United States came in Emporia, Kansas in 2007, as NewsMaxreported:
The incidence of a Somali meat packer in Kansas who died from tuberculosis has officials calling for better health screening for the waves of unskilled immigrant workers flooding smaller American communities.
In the wake of the January death at a Tyson Foods plant in Emporia, Kan., public health officials found 160 cases of latent TB among the facility’s 500 Somali workers, according to the Topeka Capital-Journal.
Local officials say the case represents only a small part of the growing problem of foreign-born, unassimilated communities with high rates of communicable diseases such as TB and HIV. Many say they need help from Washington, which has been silent on the issue for too long.
Similarly, the health risk to the general public in communities that have become centers for refugee resettlement has also been known since 2007. In that year, Ft. Wayne , Indiana experienced a huge public health problem with resettled refugees arriving from Burma with high rates of latent tuberculosis.
The failureof the political leadership at the CDC to implement the common sense, practical recommendations put forward by its own experts to conduct screening and treatment of refugees for latent tuberculosis infection overseas before they come to the United States is just the most recent indication of the terribly negative impact the politicization of public health is having on the health of American citizens.

Share:

Nearly 300 pregnant women in US test positive for Zika

The Zika virus is especially dangerous for pregnant women



Nearly 300 pregnant women in the US have tested positive for Zika virus, according to the latest figures from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).
In the US, 157 pregnant women have tested positive for the disease and 122 have tested positive in US territories.
Until now, the agency had not reported the number of women infected by the diseases in the US and its territories.
The virus is spread through mosquitoes and sexual contact.
It can cause microcephaly, a birth defect, marked by a small head size and can lead to developmental problems in infants.
Symptoms of Zika virus include mild fever, conjunctivitis, headache, joint pain and rashes.

Grey line

More on the Zika crisis:


Map showing the countries that have had confirmed cases of the Zika virus

Microcephaly: Why it is not the end of the world
What you need to know Key questions answered about the virus and its spread
Travel advice Countries affected and what you should do
The mosquito behind spread of virus What we know about the insect
Abortion dilemma Laws and practices in Catholic Latin America

Grey line

Death from the disease is rare and there is no vaccine or drug treatment available.
In Los Angeles, officials are taking prevention measures against Zika after health officials warned that outbreaks could be expected in Southern California.
The outbreak began nearly a year ago in Brazil.
The World Health Organization has said Zika virus could spread to Europe this summer.
"Everything we know about this virus seems to be scarier than we initially thought," Dr Anne Schuchat of the CDC said in April.
Earlier this year, US President Barack Obama asked the US Congress for $1.9bn (£1.25bn) in emergency funding to combat the virus.
In the meantime it has been using money totalling $589m left over from the Ebola virus fund.

Related Topics

Share:

Donald Trump 'invited to Downing Street'

Image copyright
Donald Trump says he has been invited to visit Downing Street - and expects to "do just fine" with David Cameron.
The presumptive US Republican presidential candidate did not give details, but said he "might do it".
Mr Cameron previously called him "stupid, divisive and wrong" for proposing a temporary ban on Muslims entering the US.
Number 10 said it was "longstanding practice" for the PM to meet candidates visiting the UK.
But a spokeswoman added: "Given the parties have yet to choose their nominees, there are no confirmed dates for this."
Last year, Mr Trump said many Muslims nursed a "hatred" towards America and a ban should be in force "until our country's representatives can figure out what is going on".

Analysis: Jon Sopel, BBC North America Editor

British government sources are saying no formal invitation has been extended to Donald Trump to visit Downing Street.
While it is true that hopefuls like Scott Walker, Chris Christie and Marco Rubio met the prime-minister when they were passing through London - that was before they had declared they were candidates for the Republican nomination.
A senior source said the PM would be happy to see Mr Trump once he becomes the official nominee - that will happen after the Republican Convention in July.
Four years ago the then Republican nominee, Mitt Romney, visited Downing Street - and caused consternation when he criticised Britain's preparedness for hosting the London 2012 Olympics.

Responding to the comments at the time, Mr Cameron said: "I think his remarks are divisive, stupid and wrong and I think if he came to visit our country I think it'd unite us all against him."
Downing Street has since said the PM stands by his criticism of but will work with whoever is elected US president.

More on the US election


In an interview with US news channel MSNBC, Mr Trump said: "I will do just fine with David Cameron. I think he's a nice guy. I will do just fine."
He added: "But they have asked me to visit 10 Downing Street - and I might do it."
Speaking on Friday, Mr Trump said he had been invited to Downing Street two days ago.

Related Topics

Share:

Ads 300 x 600

Categories

About

Blog Archive

Recent Posts

Unordered List

Sample Text

Pages

Theme Support

Powered by Blogger.

Facebook

Random Posts

Recent Posts

Popular Posts

Featured