World News For All

  • This is default featured slide 1 title

    Go to Blogger edit html and find these sentences.Now replace these sentences with your own descriptions.This theme is Bloggerized by Lasantha Bandara - Premiumbloggertemplates.com.

  • This is default featured slide 2 title

    Go to Blogger edit html and find these sentences.Now replace these sentences with your own descriptions.This theme is Bloggerized by Lasantha Bandara - Premiumbloggertemplates.com.

  • This is default featured slide 3 title

    Go to Blogger edit html and find these sentences.Now replace these sentences with your own descriptions.This theme is Bloggerized by Lasantha Bandara - Premiumbloggertemplates.com.

  • This is default featured slide 4 title

    Go to Blogger edit html and find these sentences.Now replace these sentences with your own descriptions.This theme is Bloggerized by Lasantha Bandara - Premiumbloggertemplates.com.

  • This is default featured slide 5 title

    Go to Blogger edit html and find these sentences.Now replace these sentences with your own descriptions.This theme is Bloggerized by Lasantha Bandara - Premiumbloggertemplates.com.

Monday, September 19, 2016

New York bombing: Ahmad Khan Rahami IDed as suspect

Police released this photo of Ahmad Khan Rahami
New York officials have identified a suspect wanted for questioning over Saturday's blast in the Chelsea area in which 29 people were injured.
The man has been identified as Ahmad Khan Rahami, 28, a naturalised US citizen from Afghanistan.
The New York Police Department (NYPD) has released a photograph.
Early on Monday, a backpack containing up to five devices exploded in Elizabeth, New Jersey when a bomb disposal robot tried to deactivate it.
Investigators have warned the suspect, whose last known address was in Elizabeth should be considered "armed and dangerous".
"Anyone who sees this individual or knows anything about him or his whereabouts needs to call it in right away," New York Mayor Bill de Blasio said on CNN.
Both the bomb that went off in New York and a device found nearby were shrapnel-filled pressure cookers, according to US media.
It is not clear who was behind the devices found in New Jersey, at the railway station in Elizabeth.
The FBI warned that Ahmad Khan Rahami should be considered armed and dangerous
Share:

Saturday, August 20, 2016

Glass bridge: China opens world's highest and longest

It's finally happened.
The much-heralded "world's highest and longest" glass-bottomed bridge has opened to visitors in central China.
It connects two mountain cliffs in what are known as the Avatar mountains (the film was shot here) in Zhangjiajie, Hunan province.

Bridge in numbers

Completed in December, the 430m-long bridge cost $3.4m (£2.6m) to build and stands 300m above ground, state news agency Xinhua reported.
It has been paved with 99 panes of three-layered transparent glass.
And according to officials, the 6m-wide bridge - designed by Israeli architect Haim Dotan - has already set world records for its architecture and construction.

The year of glass bridges

Glass bridges in China have been a popular craze for the daring photo opportunities they provide. Events like mass yoga displays and even weddings have been staged on several such bridges.
One couple celebrated their special day by dangling in mid-air from a bridge in Pingjiang, also located in Hunan province.


But how safe is it?

This was the question on everyone's minds as the city geared up for the bridge's official opening.
But officials have staged high-profile events to try and reassure the public of the bridge's safety.
Officials sent in sledgehammers and even drove a car, filled with passengers, across the bridge earlier this year.
The BBC's Dan Simmons was invited to take a bash at the bridge.


Park officials have said a maximum of 8,000 visitors will be allowed on the bridge each day.
So those wanting to add another thrill to their bucket list are strongly encouraged to book their slots in advance.
Share:

Thursday, June 30, 2016

The Smoker’s Guide to Staying Healthy

know you know that cigarettes are bad for you. And I don’t want to harp on that subject. But knowledge is power so I’d like to share with you—as I do with my patients—some research and statistics that might give you even more of an incentive to quit.
I will also show you some excellent strategies for minimizing the damage from cigarettes until you feel you are ready to wean yourself off of them completely. And, should you decide to quit, I will give you a few tips for things you can do that might make the withdrawal process easier that you might not have thought about before.
Finally, I’ll talk about whether or not switching to organic or natural, additive-free cigarettes is a safe option.
First, though, I’ll briefly discuss some of the research that shows exactly how cigarette smoke is affecting you and your family.
How Organs Heal Once You Quit
Once you quit smoking, the good news is that your organs will start repairing themselves. Researchers used to think that once you stopped smoking it would take 15 years to reduce your risk of dying from heart disease to the level of lifelong nonsmokers. Now, new findings show that in smokers who smoke less than 32 pack years (3.2 packs a day for 10 years or two packs a day for 16 years), eight years after quitting the risk of developing heart failure or dying from heart failure, heart attacks and strokes declines to the same level as those who never smoked.55
Another study showed that your heart disease risk starts to plummet in as little as three years after quitting smoking. Female non-diabetics who quit smoking within the past three years had a 26 percent lower risk of developing heart disease compared with women who continued smoking. And women who had quit smoking for more than three years saw their risk decline by 61 percent. The news gets better for female smokers with diabetes: those who quit smoking had about a 60 percent lower risk for heart disease, no matter how recently they had quit.56
Most of the women in that study gained less than 11 pounds after quitting. The small group of women who gained more than 11 pounds didn’t see as much benefit to heart health from quitting, especially if they had diabetes.56
Quitting smoking also boosts your levels of HDL cholesterol. One study published in September 2013 showed that this increase occurs soon after you quit and then evens out thereafter.57
Your risk of lung cancer also goes down after quitting. One group of researchers estimated that for females, just under eight years is the time it takes for their lung cancer risk to become half the risk of a continuing smoker. For males, it’s closer to 11 years.58
But it’s not just your risk of lung cancer that goes down. The risk of other cancers—throat, mouth, esophagus, bladder, cervix and pancreas—decreases, too.
Your Body On Cigarettes
Let’s start with heart disease. In people under 50, smoking increases the risk of heart disease and stroke by five-fold. It doubles the risk in people who are over-60.1
Nicotine amps up the heart-harming effects of the oxidized LDL cholesterol in your body, making it even more damaging to your heart by increasing plaque accumulation in your arteries.2
And smoking isn’t good for your brain either. According to research in the American Heart Association journalStroke, brain function in adults as young as 35 may decline as their heart disease risk factors—including smoking cigarettes—increase.3
Smoking also increases your chance of developing rheumatoid arthritis and is linked to insomnia as well.4-5
Smokers’ skin ages faster, too. In a study of identical twins published in November 2013, twins who smoked had more bags under the eyes and wrinkles than their non-smoking twin sibling.6
There’s also something else you might not realize about cigarettes. Remember the Russian who was poisoned by the radioactive substance polonium? Turns out every time you smoke a cigarette—unless they’re the organic or all natural variety—you’re exposed to polonium, too. That’s because the roots of tobacco plants absorb the radioactive polonium-210 found in phosphate fertilizers.
For someone smoking two packages of cigarettes a day, the radiation dose to the lungs is estimated to be at least seven times that from background sources. And in localized areas, it may be up to 1000 rem or more in 25 years.7-10
The Dangers of Thirdhand Smoke
You’ve heard of secondhand smoke, where people who don’t smoke are exposed to cigarette smoke by being around a person smoking. Secondhand smoke is just as damaging to the heart and lungs as firsthand smoke. But, recently, scientists have pinpointed another danger known as thirdhandsmoke. This refers to residue from cigarette smoking that accumulates on the surfaces anyplace where someone smokes—in the car, in the house, on clothes.
Whenever a non-smoker is exposed to thirdhand smoke, they are also being exposed to the carcinogens found in it. Researchers have found a tobacco-specific lung carcinogen known as 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanone—or NNK for short—on surfaces in smokers’ homes.11
In addition, some thirdhand smoke components react with other environmental compounds and produce secondary cancer-causing pollutants.12
Although more studies are needed to specify exactly how thirdhand smoke affects the health of non-smokers exposed to it, researchers have found that thirdhand smoke causes DNA damage in human cells.13
They’ve also found that thirdhand smoke can damage lungs extracted from rats in the uterus.14
Young kids who crawl around the floor, touch surfaces (including car upholstery and the clothes of smokers) and then place their fingers in their mouth are especially at risk of coming into contact with thirdhand smoke. Researchers have found that when infants’ bedrooms are contaminated with higher levels of thirdhand smoke, the infants have higher levels of urine cotinine, a nicotine metabolite.15
Are Natural and Organic Cigarettes Better?
The answer to that question is both yes and no. Natural (American Spirit) and organic cigarettes don’t have polonium, since phosphate fertilizer wasn’t used to grow the tobacco. Natural and organic cigarettes also contain slightly less nicotine and lack the additives that cigarette manufacturers usually include—additives that are thought to make cigarettes even more addictive. For this reason, many people swear anecdotally that natural and organic cigarettes are easier to withdraw from than regular cigarettes.16
Organic cigarettes also are better for the planet, at least in regards to the lack of pesticides sprayed on the tobacco crops.
Having said all that, natural and organic cigarettes still contain 40 known or probable carcinogens.17
Additionally, your lungs are still being exposed to smoke filled with toxins rather than clean air. In fact, the FTC requires manufacturers of the natural and organic cigarettes to include the standard Surgeon General warning about cigarettes on the packages and on marketing materials and ads.
So while natural and organic cigarettes do have some advantages over regular cigarettes, they can’t be considered safe or healthy.
If You Are Trying to Quit, Here Are Some Options
First, I recommend joining a social media support group. A recent study in the Journal of Communication found that it was easier to quit smoking if the person participates in health-specific social networking sites that focus on quitting smoking. Because of the increased social connectedness associated with participating on the sites, the members were more likely—and found it easier—to quit smoking. The members also stayed away from cigarettes for longer because of their increased ability to abstain from smoking during tempting situations such as when out drinking, stressed, sad, etc.18
Second, try acupuncture. Studies have shown that it is often effective in helping smokers quit, especially when combined with nicotine replacement therapy (chewing gums and dermal patches).19-21
eCigarettes—battery-powered metal tubes that turn nicotine-containing. Viwater into a vapor—are another option. You’ve probably heard of them, if you haven’t already tried them. In fact, a study published in The Lancet in September 2013 found that eCigarettes are as effective as the nicotine patch in helping smokers quit. The study also found that subjects who had not managed to quit smoked significantly less cigarettes when they were also smoking eCigarettes, compared to the subjects on the nicotine patch or who were given a placebo eCigarette that contained no nicotine.22
Just keep in mind that while eCigarettes result in substantially less toxin exposure than regular cigarettes—levels of toxic compounds found in the smoke from a conventional cigarette are 9-450-fold higher than levels in the vapor of an eCigarette—they aren’t completely free of toxins. For example, exposure to the carcinogen formaldehyde was comparable with that received from cigarette smoking, although formaldehyde exposure varied greatly among eCigarette brands from just 3.2 micrograms per 150 puffs to 56.1 micrograms per 150 puffs.23
Researchers have also found evidence that, among both non-smokers and smokers, using an eCigarette for only 10 minutes may result in damage to the lung.24

The bottom line? eCigarettes are an improvement over conventional cigarettes, but they’re not the perfect solution.
Other Effective Strategies
Another way to increase your odds of kicking the habit is to boost your dopamine levels. Cigarettes, like most addictive substances, influence dopamine levels.25
Most smokers who are withdrawing from cigarettes subconsciously try to increase their dopamine levels by eating too much of sugary foods and refined carbs, which increase dopamine levels.
A healthier way to boost dopamine levels while trying to quit smoking is by supplementing with tyrosine or eating foods rich in tyrosine. The body uses tyrosine to make dopamine. Foods high in tyrosine include chicken, duck, ricotta cheese, oatmeal, mustard greens, edamame, wheat germ, dark chocolate, fava beans and seaweed.
The form of niacin known as nicotinamide also boosts dopamine levels in the brain by protecting brain cells against factors that cause dopamine depletion.26-27
Niacin also is a precursor to phenylalanine, which, in turn, is a precursor to tyrosine. Plus, it lowers cholesterol levels, raises levels of HDL "the good" cholesterol (found to be lower in smokers) and protects your heart—an organ that’s particularly vulnerable to damage from cigarette smoke.28-29
Also, if depression is an issue for you, be sure to get it treated either before or while withdrawing from cigarettes. About half of smokers seeking treatment for smoking cessation have a history of depression. Scientists have found that smokers who suffer from a major depressive disorder (MDD) have a harder time quitting compared with smokers who are not depressed.30-31
Finally, try supplementing with cinnamon and green tea. Believe it or not, cinnamon has been shown to help you quit smoking,32 while green tea also helps reduce nicotine cravings.33
Do Non-Smoking Hotel Rooms Really Protect You From Smoke?
If you think staying in a non-smoking hotel room will protect you from thirdhand smoke, you may want to pay attention to the results of a study published in the June 2013 Tobacco Control.
In this study, researchers examined whether non-smoking guests staying in hotels with and without complete smoking bans were exposed to tobacco smoke pollutants. The researchers took random samples from 10 hotels with smoking bans and 30 without complete smoking bans. They analyzed surfaces and air for the tobacco smoke pollutants nicotine and 3-ethynylpyridine, or 3EP. Non-smoking subjects who stayed overnight in guestrooms provided urine and finger wipe samples to determine exposure to nicotine and a tobacco-specific carcinogen.
Compared with hotels with complete smoking bans, surface nicotine and air 3EP were elevated in both non-smoking and smoking rooms of hotels that allowed smoking. Non-smoking subjects staying in hotels without complete smoking bans had higher levels of finger nicotine and urine cotinine (a marker of nicotine exposure) than those staying in hotels with complete smoking bans. After staying in the 10 most polluted rooms, subjects had significant elevations in urinary levels of a tobacco-specific carcinogen.59
The study authors concluded, “Partial smoking bans in hotels do not protect non-smoking guests from exposure to tobacco smoke and tobacco-specific carcinogens. Non-smokers are advised to stay in hotels with complete smoking bans.”
Keeping Yourself Healthy While You Smoke
I don’t have to tell you that quitting smoking is extremely difficult. So if you are finding it impossible to quit or have only been successful at cutting back the number of cigarettes per day, at least you can try to keep your cardiovascular system as healthy as possible until you succeed at going cold turkey. There are a number of healthy habits you can engage in that will partially protect your body against the toxins you inhale each time you take a puff. And these habits will put you in a stronger place emotionally and physically where you might be more likely to quit.
One of these habits is exercise. Moderate exercise strengthens the heart and reduces the risk of cancer.34-35Additionally, in smokers with post-traumatic stress syndrome (PTSD), the highest levels of PTSD symptoms occurred in regular smokers reporting low weekly exercise levels.36
In some, but not all, studies, exercise has reduced cigarette cravings and withdrawal symptoms.37 In a study of pregnant women, exercise significantly reduced cigarette cravings. It also produced some non-significant—but yet still large—effects on reducing restlessness, stress, irritability, tension and depression.38
It’s important not to overtax yourself, though. Too much exercise can cause free radical damage in the healthiest of people, but this damage is even worse in smokers.39
One exercise you might want to try is yoga. Many studies have shown it’s a great way to keep your cardiovascular system in shape and that it can lower hypertension.40-41
Plus, clinical trials have concluded yoga may help smokers quit the habit. Although researchers are still calling for larger studies, the studies that have been conducted are very promising and show that yoga can reduce cigarette cravings.42-43

Share:

Sunday, May 22, 2016

Austria presidential vote: Run-off rivals face dead heat

Norbert Hofer (left) is up against Alexander Van der Bellen, who has the support of the Greens
The far-right and independent candidates in Austria's presidential run-off face a dead heat, a public TV projection suggests.
Norbert Hofer of the Freedom Party and Alexander Van der Bellen are each on 50%, according to the estimate, which includes postal votes not yet counted.
Official figures from Sunday's ballot give Mr Hofer a lead of 3.8% but do not include postal voting.
The final official results will not be known until Monday.
For the first time since World War Two, both the main centrist parties were knocked out in the first round.
A key issue in the campaign was Europe's migrant crisis, which has seen asylum-seeker numbers soar.
About 90,000 people claimed asylum in Austria last year, equivalent to about 1% of the Austrian population, and the Freedom Party ran an anti-immigration campaign.
The presidency is a largely ceremonial post, but a victory for Mr Hofer could be the springboard for Freedom Party success in the next parliamentary elections, scheduled for 2018.
The presidents of the European Commission and the European Parliament, Jean-Claude Juncker and Martin Schulz, have both expressed concern over a Hofer victory.

A country divided: Bethany Bell, BBC News, Vienna

Austria is split. The soft-spoken, charismatic Mr Hofer, sometimes described as a wolf in sheep's clothing, caused turmoil in Austrian politics when he won a clear victory in the first round of voting in April.
But now his rival, Mr Van der Bellen from the Greens, has caught up. The far right has profited from deep frustration with the established parties of the centre left and the centre right in Austria. And in recent months, it has been boosted further by fears about the migrant crisis.
The president is a largely ceremonial figure but does have the power to dismiss the government. Mr Hofer has threatened to do so if the ruling coalition does not take swift action on the migrant crisis.
If he wins, it could have an impact far beyond Austria's borders - possibly giving momentum to far-right and Eurosceptic parties in other EU countries.

According to the interior ministry's final count of votes cast at polling-stations(in German), Mr Hofer took 51.9% to 48.1% for Mr Van der Bellen.
But ORF public TV's projection (in German), which is usually considered reliable, has both men on 50%.
Postal voting accounts for some 900,000 ballots, or 14% of eligible voters.
"None of us wished for this," Mr Hofer told ORF.
"After all, both of us wanted to have a good night's sleep but it is so exciting. I've been in politics for a long time but I've never experienced an election night like this one."
Whoever won, he said, would have "the job of uniting Austria".
In the first round, Mr Hofer secured 35% of the votes, while Mr Van der Bellen polled 21%.
The two rivals had engaged in an angry TV debate earlier in the week, described as "political mud-wrestling" by commentators.

Vying to lead Austria

Norbert Hofer
Norbert Hofer in Pinkafeld, Austria, 22 MayImage copyrightEPA
  • Age: 45
  • Background: Aeronautical engineer
  • Politics: Far-right Freedom Party
  • Campaign soundbite: "To those in Austria who go to war for the Islamic State or rape women - I say to those people: 'This is not your home'"
Alexander Van der Bellen
Alexander Van der Bellen in Vienna, 22 MayImage copyrightAFP
  • Age: 72
  • Background: Economics professor
  • Politics: Former Green Party leader
  • Campaign soundbite: "I've experienced how Austria rose from the ruins of World War Two, caused by the madness of nationalism."

Political upset

Such was the political shock at the far right's first-round win that the Chancellor (prime minister), Werner Faymann, resigned after losing the support of his Social Democratic party colleagues.
The Social Democrats and the People's Party have governed Austria for decades, either alone or in coalition.
At the last general election in 2013, they together won just enough votes to govern in a "grand coalition".
Incumbent President Heinz Fischer, 77, could not run again after two terms in office.
Rise of nationalists in Europe - graphic
Share:

Friday, May 20, 2016

Health Expert Blasts CDC: Ignores Own Study, Allows Refugees Into U.S. Without Latent TB Screening

Dr. Jane Orient, executive director of the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons, is criticizing the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) for allowing refugees to enter the United States without screening and treatment for latent tuberculosis.

Seven of the agency’s own public health experts said such screening and treatment “would potentially save millions of dollars and contribute to United States TB elimination goals” in a research article published in December.
“Admitting people who might cause an epidemic makes no sense whatsoever from a public health standpoint,” Orient tells Breitbart News.
“It suggests that those who favor it do not care about the cost in suffering, death, and expense to Americans,” Orient says, adding she agrees with the public health experts currently or formerly employed at the CDC who concluded that screening of refugees for latent tuberculosis and successful treatment of those who test positive for the disease prior to their entry into the country is the proper public health policy for the United States.
But the political leadership at CDC does not appear to be following the screening and treatment recommendations of the study done by its own experts, and has not yet responded to inquiries from Breitbart News whether it plans to change course.
“If for humanitarian reasons we wish to help people fleeing persecution, there is still no need to release them into the general population of susceptible individuals. Officials who place politics above the health of Americans need to be held accountable and removed from positions of authority,” Orient says.
In a December 2015 study published at BMC Health, “a peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on the epidemiology of disease and the understanding of all aspects of public health,” seven public health professionals who at the time worked at the CDC’sDivision of Global Migration and Quarantine concluded that:
Implementing LTBI [latent tuberculosis infection] screening and treatment for United States bound refugees from countries with high or moderate LTBI prevalence would potentially save millions of dollars and contribute to United States TB elimination goals. These estimates are conservative since secondary transmission from tuberculosis cases in the United States was not considered in the model.
At least one of the authors of the study that recommended screening and treatment of U.S. bound refugees for latent tuberculosis infection is no longer affiliated with the CDC.
“Tuberculosis is one of the most lethal infectious diseases in history. It is easily transmitted, say on a public bus. Increasingly, it is becoming highly resistant to all our antibiotics,” Dr. Orient tells Breitbart News.
“The course of treatment is at best lengthy, and for resistant forms costly and toxic. Isolation of infected persons is essential to keep this plague from spreading. It is not even clear that treatment of latent infection in persons from regions where multiple-drug resistant TB is prevalent is even effective,” Orient adds.
Currently, however, the CDC does not screen or test the 70,000 refugees brought in to the U.S. annually under the federal refugee resettlement program country for latent tuberculosis infection. The refugees are tested for active tuberculosis, and allowed entry into the U.S. subsequent to what the CDC determines is successful treatment.
Even those refugees treated for active Multi Drug Resistant (MDR) tuberculosis, as shown in this video of Burmese refugees who have the disease being treated in a refugee camp in Thailand, are allowed to enter the United States despite recent studies that indicate that between 4 percent and 5 percent of those deemed successfully treated experience a recurrence of tuberculosis within 2 years.
The Minnesota Department of Health recently reported that 22 percent of resettled refugees in that state tested positive for latent tuberculosis, as opposed to 4 percent of the general population.
Other research indicates that anywhere from 20 percent to 49 percent of resettled refugees test positive for latent tuberculosis.
The CDC says that many resettled refugees are screened for latent tuberculosis within a month of their arrival in the United States, and encouraged to voluntarily participate in the 6 month to 9 month latent tuberculosis treatment regimens. Between 70 percent and 85 percent of those who participate successfully complete those latent tuberculosis treatment regimens, which means between 15 percent and 30 percent fail to complete those regimens.
More than 3 million refugees have been resettled in the United States since 1975, according to the Office of Refugee Resettlement (ORR), the department of Health and Human Services that operates the federal refugee resettlement program
Neither the CDC nor the ORR responded to inquiries from Breitbart News to get an estimate of the number of resettled refugees who are never screened for latent tuberculosis subsequent to their arrival in the United States.
Since 10 percent of those with latent tuberculosis develop active tuberculosis, the potential public health risk of the current policy is apparent to many public health experts, but not to the bureaucrats at the CDC and in a number of state and local health departments around the country.
Another arm of the federal government, the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF), however, recently issued a draft recommendation that is consistent with the findings of the December 2015 study about the importance of screening and treatment for latent tuberculosis population among “at risk” populations, which includes resettled refugees.
“The USPSTF recommends screening for latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) in populations that are at increased risk,” the draft recommendation concludes.
“Populations that are at increased risk for LTBI based on increased prevalence of active disease and increased risk of exposure include persons who were born in, or are former residents of, countries with increased tuberculosis prevalence and persons who live in, or have lived in, high-risk congregate settings (such as homeless shelters and correctional facilities),” the draft recommendation continues.
Crowded refugee camps in countries like Kenya, where many Somali refugees live prior to their entrance to the United States, are also “high-risk congregate settings.”
The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force, was founded as part of the federal government in 1984 as “an independent, volunteer panel of national experts in prevention and evidence-based medicine. The Task Force works to improve the health of all Americans by making evidence-based recommendations about clinical preventive services such as screenings, counseling services, and preventive medications.”
The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality “convene[s] the Task Force and . . . provide[s] ongoing scientific, administrative, and dissemination support to the Task Force.”
“The USPSTF recommends screening for latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) in populations that are at increased risk,” the draft recommendation concludes.
“In 2014, among persons of known national origin, 66.5% of all active tuberculosis cases in the United States were among foreign-born persons, and the case rate among foreign-born persons was 13.4 times higher than among U.S.-born persons (15.3 vs. 1.1 cases per 100,000 persons),” the draft recommendation continues.
“The World Health Organization (WHO) recently updated its list of countries with a high burden of tuberculosis to include the top 20 countries with the highest absolute numbers of cases, plus an additional 10 countries with the most severe burden in terms of case rate per capita,” the draft recommendation adds.
A number of countries on that list are also on the CDC’s list of  “[t]he top ten countries of refugee origin [which includes] Afghanistan, Iraq, Somali, DR Congo, Myanmar, Colombia, Sudan, Vietnam, Eritrea, and China.”
All ten of these countries had dramatically higher tuberculosis morbidity rates in 2014 than the United States, according to the World Health Organization.
That year, there were only 0.1 deaths from tuberculosis for every 100,000 residents of the United States.
The Democratic Republic of Congo, in contrast, experienced 69 deaths from tuberculosisfor every 100,000 residents, a rate more than 690 times greater than the rate in the United States.
Myanmar (Burma) experienced 53 deaths from tuberculosis for every 100,000 residents, a rate more than 530 times greater than the rate in the United States.
Afghanistan experienced 44 deaths from tuberculosis for every 100,000 residents, a rate more than 440 times greater than the rate in the United States.
China experienced the lowest tuberculosis mortality among the top ten countries of refugee origin in 2014—2.8 deaths per 100,000—but even that rate was 28 times greater than the rate in the United States.
Somalia, another of the ten leading countries of origins for resettled refugees in the U.S. had the second highest rate of tuberculosis mortality of the ten leading countries of origins for resettled refugees in the U.S.—67 tuberculosis deaths per 100,000—or more than 670 times greater than the rate in the United States.
Somalia is one of the top countries of origins for resettled refugees who settle in the states of Minnesota, North Dakota, and Tennessee.
In 2015, 26 percent of the 518 refugees resettled in North Dakota came from Somalia.
Some 45 percent of the 2,338 refugees who resettled in Minnesota during 2015 were from Somalia. 40 percent were from Burma.
The first evidence of a possible linkage between resettled refugees from Somalia to tuberculosis outbreaks in the United States came in Emporia, Kansas in 2007, as NewsMaxreported:
The incidence of a Somali meat packer in Kansas who died from tuberculosis has officials calling for better health screening for the waves of unskilled immigrant workers flooding smaller American communities.
In the wake of the January death at a Tyson Foods plant in Emporia, Kan., public health officials found 160 cases of latent TB among the facility’s 500 Somali workers, according to the Topeka Capital-Journal.
Local officials say the case represents only a small part of the growing problem of foreign-born, unassimilated communities with high rates of communicable diseases such as TB and HIV. Many say they need help from Washington, which has been silent on the issue for too long.
Similarly, the health risk to the general public in communities that have become centers for refugee resettlement has also been known since 2007. In that year, Ft. Wayne , Indiana experienced a huge public health problem with resettled refugees arriving from Burma with high rates of latent tuberculosis.
The failureof the political leadership at the CDC to implement the common sense, practical recommendations put forward by its own experts to conduct screening and treatment of refugees for latent tuberculosis infection overseas before they come to the United States is just the most recent indication of the terribly negative impact the politicization of public health is having on the health of American citizens.

Share:

Ads 300 x 600

Categories

About

Recent Posts

Unordered List

Sample Text

Pages

Theme Support

Powered by Blogger.

Facebook

Random Posts

Recent Posts

Popular Posts

Featured